Let's not forget that the report we saw last week proved nothing. The company testing his device were poorly equipped (skills wise) to perform such an analysis

Let's not forget that the report we saw last week proved nothing. The company testing his device were poorly equipped (skills wise) to perform such an analysis and basically chose the answer they wanted with weak to no real evidence. The comment about e2e making it virtually impossible to know what was in the payload immediately put me off anything they said; they had the end of the e2e in their hands and thus everything they needed to decrypt the payload. Someone posted a wrapper script proving all the tools needed already existed. The article is based on that report and thus is immediately unfounded speculation.