That's not how it works. Do we need to establish a trial before we can show your innocence in this case too? If he is guilty, then let it be shown so at trial.

That's not how it works. Do we need to establish a trial before we can show your innocence in this case too? If he is guilty, then let it be shown so at trial. In absence of such a trial, he is not guilty. But such a trial will not happen, and was probably never intended to happen. Yet it shows how effective the media campaign against him has been: The Swedish state spent almost a decade intentionally presenting Julian Assange to the public as a sex offender. Then, they suddenly abandoned the case against him on the strength of the same argument that the first Stockholm prosecutor used in 2010, when she initially suspended the investigation after just five days