3 ms·
Mandating wireless charging is still a bit of a stretch (it's not popular yet, so would be a short-term cost and manufacturing increase), but wireless charging
by aaronmdjones 7y ago
Mandating wireless charging is still a bit of a stretch (it's not popular yet, so would be a short-term cost and manufacturing increase), but wireless charging is mentioned in the linked article as something they should look into ensuring is broadly-compatible (which should help prevent incompatibility waste when it does become ubiquitous).
Also, presently anyway, wireless charging generally has power limits on the order of 5 watts, while the USB 3 PD spec allows for up to 100. A modern mobile phone pulls more than 5 watts from a wall charger, so mandating wireless charging would also result in a short-term charging time increase. They're also not as easy to transport and use anywhere (e.g. on a train with a power socket but without a tray table). Many people would find that unacceptable.
My Nexus 5 had wireless charging, I had that phone for more than 3 years, and I never got to use it before it died and I upgraded to a 6P, which doesn't have it.
- toomuchtodo 7y agoI’m on an iPhone 11 Pro Max with Qi chargers in my vehicles, on my night stand, and at my desk and use wireless charging almost exclusively. Likely where my bias originates for assuming wireless charging would see broad use. I would like to see clean solutions in coffee shops and on trains for Qi charging to enable the most common use cases of course.