5 ms·
Standardizing (controlling) by fiat tech they didn't make, with no real need or justification. Just for the sake of the flex, being busybodies, and pretending t
by epicgiga 7y ago
Standardizing (controlling) by fiat tech they didn't make, with no real need or justification. Just for the sake of the flex, being busybodies, and pretending they're important and "the boss of you".
Sooner that rabble gets overthrown the better. One domino has fallen now, hope the rest follow in short order.
- SideburnsOfDoom 7y agoWe see lots of this mouth-frothing, hate-fulled rhetoric on reddit, and IMHO I don't want it to spread.
- t223 7y agoI believe it’s too late. In my opinion the current political climate has fueled outrage culture and from my perspective things have gone from bad to worse.
- epicgiga 7y agoNothin wrong with hate when targeted at vice, nothing wrong with love when targeted at virtue.
- mambojumbo 7y agoOh the good old censorship wishes of the far left. Fortunately the world doesn't revolve around you. The EU has bigger battles to fight yet it chose to waste taxpayers money debating this nonsense.
- dTal 7y agoOr maybe the need and justification is that multiple similar but incompatible charging standards is wasteful and annoying. As that's the stated reason, it seems a bit more likely than "for the sake of flex". Is government regulation of non-goverment tech illegitimate? That would be most all regulation then.