> “Why Sheet 2 exists is an interesting question,” was Jonathan’s response and he agreed that “it is well that the paper is being retracted” when I asked him di

> “Why Sheet 2 exists is an interesting question,” was Jonathan’s response and he agreed that “it is well that the paper is being retracted” when I asked him directly about this and that perfectly sums up my feelings as well. ... While I’m not sure what Sheet 2 means or why it exists; I do know that the data in this paper also suffer from inexplicable irregularities rendering any results untrustworthy. > Given the problems in my data sets, these folks are proactively investigating data that they received from Jonathan ... It's great that she is sticking solely to the facts and being very scientific. But I'd love to read a journalist's in-depth investigation into Johnathan's motivations. Everything points to this being a deliberate, dishonest fabrication of data.