3 ms·
If we just start assuming posters are lying, why should I assume you aren't lying? Were you really trying to be nice to the poster, or were you defending a comp
by kerkeslager 7y ago
If we just start assuming posters are lying, why should I assume you aren't lying? Were you really trying to be nice to the poster, or were you defending a company that forges documents to fake consent to violate your privacy? It sure sounded like you were defending State Farm's actions, and like what you're saying now is a backpedal. What motivated your decision to stop being nice and accuse the poster of lying?
I don't see much reason to disbelieve what the poster said, given this is just a logical next step from sneaky behavior I've already seen lots of companies engage in.
- kop316 7y agoI in general try to assume good intentions for someone else, and before I go accusing someone of being dumb or malicious, I like to hear others opinion. I suggest you try that sometime. I find life to be much better when I just don't go accusing people of bad intentions like you just did to me.
- kerkeslager 7y ago> I in general try to assume good intentions for someone else, and before I go accusing someone of being dumb or malicious, I like to hear others opinion. Is that what you think you were doing when you said, > Being blunt, I think the poster has no idea how insurance works, and didn't bother to read anything while signing up. Now they are upset because they actually read it. > Or being less charitable, they did understand the process, and wanted to create fake outrage about it. > But the story does not add up to me at all taken at face value. Let's unpack this gem: > I suggest you try that sometime. I find life to be much better when I just don't go accusing people of bad intentions like you just did to me. You realize I was just turning what you said back on you? My point is: it doesn't feel good does it? So maybe don't do that? You're literally objecting to something you did.