4 ms·
Mostly because you've entered into an agreement with the first party (however dubious, that's another argument) and have consented to their terms to use their p
by bluntfang 7y ago
Mostly because you've entered into an agreement with the first party (however dubious, that's another argument) and have consented to their terms to use their platform. There wasn't a checkbox that said "I consent to third parties storing all of my information after we decide to shutdown the platform".
Consent is paramount to privacy, and archiving everything without consent is a breaking a huge privacy and trust boundary.
- betamaxthetape 7y agoGoing into this, we did understand that this could be a concern. We are committed to working with group moderators as we work to make what we've saved available, and will be honoring valid take-down requests for content that people that prefer the content to not be online.
- bluntfang 7y agoSorry, but you're doing consent wrong. Consent is something received before an action.
- bnj 7y agoWould you mind clarifying your objection for me? Don't authors of posts assume the risk that third parties will copy and reuse the content when they publish it?
- bluntfang 7y agoJust because the risk is there doesn't mean we should be forced to accept it. There is currently a battle waging for our privacy.