4 ms·
This seems unfair towards CIDER. Cider has excellent debugging, stacktrace navigation, integration with other tooling and more... that isn't available in Calva.
by casion 7y ago
This seems unfair towards CIDER. Cider has excellent debugging, stacktrace navigation, integration with other tooling and more... that isn't available in Calva.
I would never say that you can't use Calva to get work done, but CIDER has a good deal more than what Calva offers currently.
I could accept that maybe "99% of users don't need what CIDER offers", but saying that Calva is 99% of what CIDER offers is just completely incorrect.
- lvh 7y ago... Good thing that I said "but 99% of the stuff you will actually use works totally fine in Calva" which is a lot closer to your first example than the second? Given that I explicitly acknowledge the feature gap?