3 ms·
Then there would be a loophole where you make an independent entity that “makes” something that shields infinite liability. It makes sense to go after all benef
by chrischen 7y ago
Then there would be a loophole where you make an independent entity that “makes” something that shields infinite liability. It makes sense to go after all beneficiary owners and parties.
- stefan_ 7y agoYou mean like they make shell companies for patents so any adverse judgements don't sink the whole boat? Hell yeah, lets have it then.
- stubish 7y agoI see. So I guess, assuming appeals don't overturn the decision, then Apple needs to sue Broadcom for damages? I don't see Apple left holding the bag in this. Unless they would rather use it as a stick when negotiating future deals with Broadcom.