4 ms·
> I think punishing the engineer would be much less practical than the CEO. Of course. I wouldn't really ever consider engineers to be to blame - they could wh
by dfsegoat 7y ago
> I think punishing the engineer would be much less practical than the CEO.
Of course. I wouldn't really ever consider engineers to be to blame - they could whistleblow of course, but the people that inked the deal and brought it to the engineers should be held responsible.
If we can't hold the tech industry responsible for this, what hope do we have holding them responsible for murkier issues like privacy/data collection?
edit: by "developers" in my parent post, I meant "the EHR company"
- batiudrami 7y agoA fundamental part of engineering accreditation in most countries is ethics and enforcing the fact that you are to blame for the things you build and you are obligated to raise objection.