4 ms·
It's the difference between "do" and "should". He's saying the book claims to explain human behavior; it doesn't recommend or justify that behavior.
by spoondan 16y ago
It's the difference between "do" and "should". He's saying the book claims to explain human behavior; it doesn't recommend or justify that behavior.
- hartror 16y agoYet others are using it to recommend and justify the behavior.
- spoondan 16y agoSure, but I don't think your complaint is with the book. You can't blame the evidence for the case the prosecutor makes.
- hartror 16y agoPoint taken, given I haven't read the book I assumed the book made the same conclusion that was being forwarded on this thread.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- yummyfajitas 16y agoI simply said that a particular strategy is unlikely to work for men. That's a positive claim.