> Instead, the author is claiming is that some ways are strictly better than others, and that they want to use techniques that are strictly better than their cu

> Instead, the author is claiming is that some ways are strictly better than others, and that they want to use techniques that are strictly better than their current techniques. That is not how I interpreted the post, but I do (mostly) agree with it. I think "strictly better" is a real thing that exists, though I do also think it gets over-applied a lot of the time.