4 ms·
assuming the participants are honest is useful because someone else can prove how to participate in a trust-less fashion, e.g. via homomorphic encryption
by onefuncman 7y ago
assuming the participants are honest is useful because someone else can prove how to participate in a trust-less fashion, e.g. via homomorphic encryption
- tastroder 7y agoThat kind of sounds too "move fast and break things" for something that's essentially a systems description with an actual implementation they likely want to sell. At any rate, it might be useful for the Blockchain part of the system I don't care too much about. My comment was meant to address the actual work part of the system. It relies on client trust w.r.t. not only the network but also the models and data they put in, which I don't even see mentioned in the document. I don't see how the architecture described in there would be able to even attempt to break down training processes enough to prevent a malicious actor from extracting substantial parts of the system without crippling performance.