> Uber and Lyft sidelined the regulations around taxis when they launched because "disruption". This isn’t a reason to prevent them from being on Market Street

> Uber and Lyft sidelined the regulations around taxis when they launched because "disruption". This isn’t a reason to prevent them from being on Market Street as compared to taxis. Both serve the same function. Maybe I misinterpreted, but this sentence makes it sound like you think banning them from a street while not banning taxis is a reasonable way to apply regulations BECAUSE Uber and Lyft ignored regulations in the past. I agree in principle with what you follow up with, that there isn’t a limit to the number of rideshare vehicles in SF at any given time (at least not with current technology, although it wouldn’t be difficult to do).