I understand it's against the rules to suggest someone hasn't read the article. But I think it's pretty clear from this comment that the article has zero to do

I understand it's against the rules to suggest someone hasn't read the article. But I think it's pretty clear from this comment that the article has zero to do with the posted article. The article's title was provocative and humorous, bc it's abt using C in a very peculiar way. It's not about the tired argument of "should we replace C with Rust/etc." which the above poster and many others have glommed onto. This waterfall of irrelevant comments has no place next to this article which is abt a very specific, interesting set of techniques.