Now you're right in that traditionally Epic has served larger healthcare systems and tertiary hospitals, (hell they have even been known to turn down customers)

Now you're right in that traditionally Epic has served larger healthcare systems and tertiary hospitals, (hell they have even been known to turn down customers), but I think there's potentially a bit of role reversal on the horizon. Some Epic deployments have been creeping into community groups through licensing agreements [1, 2]. Probably makes more sense if you want your clinic pop to have greater access to tertiary services. It's something I would keep my eye on within the EHR business space. Also, my previous comment was in response to no one liking Epic though, so certainly on topic. [1]. https://health.ucsd.edu/news/releases/Pages/2015-05-06-uc-san-deigo-health-system-enters-agreement-with-ECRMC.aspx https://health.ucsd.edu/news/releases/Pages/2015-05-06-uc-sa... [2]. https://ucsdhn.org/providers/physician-network/advantages/technology/Pages/default.aspx https://ucsdhn.org/providers/physician-network/advantages/te...