4 ms·

How do the community standards defend this page / business? I mean, it’s clearly not useful, valuable, or active. It has no reviews, it’s clearly not a real bu

• mcbutterbunz 7y ago
  Im assuming that the problem stems from the review process, which is likely all automated (and poorly). I doubt that a human ever actually looked at this, which is a problem in itself. It wasn't until actual humans got word of the situation that things changed.
• krapp 7y ago
  The community standard is that it doesn't break a specific rule - that is the sniff test. Context-specific pun intended. Facebook doesn't have the right to decide what pages are or are not "legitimate", useful, viable or active apart from whether they violate its terms of service - to do so would be exactly the sort of censorship and violation of freedom of expression that people here are usually up in arms about. Today it's this girl's butthole. Tomorrow it might be a religion or a political party that is arbitrarily determined to be "not legitimate" and banned by the powers that be. And then what? It's the butt of fascism on our heads forever.
  • lawlessone 7y ago
    >Facebook doesn't have the right to decide what pages are or are not "legitimate", useful, viable or active apart from whether they violate its terms of service - to do so would be exactly the sort of censorship and violation of freedom of expression that people here are usually up in arms about. On Facebook , Facebook has that right.