I think the outcome for Packard & Hewlett would have been much different if they had not put so much effort into meaningful R & D. Once you get that much going

I think the outcome for Packard & Hewlett would have been much different if they had not put so much effort into meaningful R & D. Once you get that much going on, nobody can launch it all anyway. If you could, Thos Edison's lab or Bell Labs would have probably scaled most hyperly themselves. As a technology marketer, I think you should have much more technology that you are not selling compared to what you are promising to deliver. Even better if you can just keep the technology coming to delight customers more so as you go along. Sometimes a highly scaled startup seems to define itself as an unsolved problem where there is exponential uptake begging for a solution. If someone can figure it out.