5 ms·
It's interesting to see an organization like RStudio decide to change their status to a public benefit corporation, plus go through the process of becoming a ce
by qchris 7y ago
It's interesting to see an organization like RStudio decide to change their status to a public benefit corporation, plus go through the process of becoming a certified B Corp. The nature of a PBC, in having more latitude to consider actions that don't necessarily build shareholder value as their primary concern, certainly seems to line up well with its open-source roots.
I've tended to associate PBCs with companies like Patagonia, Ben and Jerry's, etc.--ones that make physical things, rather make software (which seems more like intellectual property, to a degree? Mostly relevant in terms of material cost of reproduction). I'm curious to see what kind of impact this will have on their operations and direction, and if it might lead to a similar trend with other open-source-based corporations like Gitlab or Elastic.
- ianbooker 7y agoI think this is also a very rational move. IDEs and tooling is just participial about actual performance of said software, but also about the culture and community it is embedded in. So going for a long term commitment to open source is a strong signal to users and other stakeholders. Bringing up Gitlab in this regard is a very good point, especially after MS bought Github..