5 ms·
This would only explain the performance for the last 10 years. There were no "sucker" funds for the first 20.
by RookyNumbas 7y ago
This would only explain the performance for the last 10 years. There were no "sucker" funds for the first 20.
- throwaway2048 7y agoHow do you know?
- auntienomen 7y agoThe "sucker funds" would have had to be among the largest in the industry, with lots of external investors to provide the capital. You really think something like that would remain completely secret?