3 ms·
> I would never opt in to affect 99.9% of users because of 0.01% of users Exactly. And thats the only point which needs to be made here. It's like if one pers
by bilekas 7y ago
> I would never opt in to affect 99.9% of users because of 0.01% of users
Exactly. And thats the only point which needs to be made here.
It's like if one person was drink driving and hit someone. saying : "Well now thats it, we need to ban driving".
- vageli 7y agoYeah, why aren't breathalyzers mandated in every vehicle? Even though we as a society pretty uniformly agree (from the people I've spoken with) that drunk driving is bad in every case, why don't we resort to such extreme measures? Why don't we just strip prisoners naked and keep them in glass cages? We would certainly need fewer armed guards if that were the case. Thank goodness we are not there yet.
- rapnie 7y agoFunny thing is in France they did require having breathalyzers in your car by law. But it is not really in effect now. https://www.drive-france.com/faqs/france-breathalyzer-law/ https://www.drive-france.com/faqs/france-breathalyzer-law/
- tsukikage 7y agoI have to admit, I never quite understood the purpose of requiring you to keep a breathalyzer kit in the car without requiring you to actually use it.