That was considered by some scientists who would pay a price if they were wrong, concluding it wasn't a serious risk. The calculation here is being decided by a

That was considered by some scientists who would pay a price if they were wrong, concluding it wasn't a serious risk. The calculation here is being decided by a company who'll pay nothing if they're wrong yet will profit if they're not. But say for a minute this statement isn't true: that they proceeded with hugely risky experiments without a careful analysis. Would that mean being so reckless again now is justified? You would use blind luck last time to justify another round of Russian roulette?