4 ms·
ISO/ANSI would be my preference. That's still not the best model of language governance, but at least it's not down to one company. Also a decent sign of stabil
by mhd 7y ago
ISO/ANSI would be my preference. That's still not the best model of language governance, but at least it's not down to one company. Also a decent sign of stability.
- jhoechtl 7y agoSo you like to pay for specs?
- pansa2 7y agoBetter than not having a standard at all...
- mhd 7y agoNo, and I don't like paying for membership and voting rights, either. Never mind the pervasive corporate sponsorship of most members on working groups, regulatory capture etc. But I think it's still better than ad hoc "RTFC" standards or BFDLs.