>Everything dies. As a step in an argument, this doesn't look promising. And..? >As long as it is ethical and not torture, I don't see an issue with fishing.

>Everything dies. As a step in an argument, this doesn't look promising. And..? >As long as it is ethical and not torture, I don't see an issue with fishing. Yes, sure, people have to decide for themselves where on the scale of life from bacteria/viruses to, uh, humans, they draw the ethical "eat/not eat" line. I couldn't parse/understand the two sentences after that, sorry. Good luck with your product... Oh, without plant deaths?! hehe. Sounds like you have something more complicated than a single dividing line.