>Nothing about the greenest and most sustainable solution: reducing consumption. Well that's because it's not a realistic solution. Any solution that goes agai

>Nothing about the greenest and most sustainable solution: reducing consumption. Well that's because it's not a realistic solution. Any solution that goes against the human nature is doomed to fail. Our species historically had issues with implementing solutions that require short-term detriment no matter how large the long term benefits were. Montreal protocol is often cited as one of these collective actions that succeeded, however what is NOT often cited is that the cost of implementing it was tiny compared to respective countries GDP. I.e. millions, not billions of USD.