4 ms·

> affordable affordable, but efficiency is so-so. 70-80% according to Wikipedia [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity#Economic

• galacticdessert 7y ago
  It does not matter. The alternative is curtailing wind parks/solar generation, and wasting clean energy and even more money.
• tasuki 7y ago
  > affordable, but efficiency is so-so. 70-80% according to Wikipedia Say what? So-so? 70-80% efficiency sounds pretty damn amazing!
  • 2rsf 7y ago
    depends on the alternatives, which at the moment are indeed considerably worst
• syllable_studio 7y ago
  I love this quote: Hydro pumped storage is “astoundingly efficient…In this future world where we want renewables to get 20%, 30%, or 50% of our electricity generation, you need pumped hydro storage. It’s an incredible opportunity.” – U.S. Energy Secretary Dr. Steven Chu in 2009. Still true today. And actually, we think that 80-85% round trip is more accurate for our projects because we'll use the latest/greatest tech (variable-speed reversible francis style pump/generator turbines). I think the 70% from these figures is citing older projects with pump/turbines that were not quite as efficient.