You're avoiding the primary point, and the only point that Google complained about ("deception"). Suspicious. If you really wish to keep nitpicking on gambling

You're avoiding the primary point, and the only point that Google complained about ("deception"). Suspicious. If you really wish to keep nitpicking on gambling, I'll introduce you to a snippet of the Google TOS which invalidates any argument you may have as to whether or not your app can be considered gambling: > "... including, but not limited to... " The list of scenarios is non-exclusive, and Google is free to add additional scenarios and interpretations to the list as they please. > Loyalty points convert to Bitcoin it's not complicated if it was would our rating be 4.5 we have not bought any users ever. Your rating does not interest me, although I am slightly amused that you're saying you bought your users. I, as an end-user reading your terms, find your payout scheme rather complicated: You only pay out above a certain threshold, only once a week, and only if you remember to register (despite probably mining regardless). A lot of areas that lead to no or missed payouts. > Search rewards apps on Google there are hundreds of them. Those do not violate Google terms. This is entirely irrelevant. Google's enforcement of a policy does not affect its validity.