3 ms·
Well intelligence is partially hereditary, and childless men won't be passing on their genes, so I counter that these men really aren't as intelligent as claime
by oarabbus_ 7y ago
Well intelligence is partially hereditary, and childless men won't be passing on their genes, so I counter that these men really aren't as intelligent as claimed.
- Zenbit_UX 7y ago> and childless men won't be passing on their genes, so I counter that these men really aren't as intelligent as claimed. Hmm, I guess we found the breeder? Not even sure where to begin with this, circular reasoning? Have you perhaps considered that these intelligent people have considered tgat passing on their genes is not as valuable to them as other things they might value? I'd posit you haven't, and further, you shouldn't consider yourself among them.
- oarabbus_ 7y agoI don't have any kids, so you failed to find "the breeder". Nor do I consider myself particularly intelligent, making you 0 for 2, and it all the more wonderfully ironic if you considered yourself amongst that group.
- Zenbit_UX 7y agoI said you shouldn't consider yourself among them, not that you do. Also your circular arguments towards childless men being stupid while also being a self-proclaimed "stupid & childless man" is poetic and somehow makes sense to me.
- PlugTunin 7y agoIt's possible to be intelligent but not have an interest in passing on the genes for such.
- oarabbus_ 7y agoI challenge that notion. It displays a shortsightedness which is uncharacteristic of intelligence.