2 ms·
That is correct, this was done in partnership with AWS to show off Aurora, however we have achieved similar results with stock MySQL. We are pretty confident th
by dkhenry 7y ago
That is correct, this was done in partnership with AWS to show off Aurora, however we have achieved similar results with stock MySQL. We are pretty confident that with standard MySQL using MyRocks and some high end storage devices we will be able to beat those numbers with fewer resources.
- pm90 7y agoDon't mean to be crass... but why not do what you just describe and publish it to promote Vitess? Would lay the argument to rest :)
- dkhenry 7y agoThe cost to run those benchmarks with AWS was close to $50,000 just in infrastructure cost ( that was the main reason we jumped from 16 shards to 64 shards at the larger instance size, we wanted to show the top end, but we didn't have the resources to do all the sizes in between ), that doesn't even account for the engineering time to put together the solution and run the tests. We would love to have more funding to run those kinds of tests, but Vitess doesn't have a big sponsoring company to bankroll it the way some other projects do.