3 ms·
There is probably no way of formally proving that an AI actually has general intelligence on a human level. The Turing test is merely a more elaborate way of sa
by iwwr 16y ago
There is probably no way of formally proving that an AI actually has general intelligence on a human level. The Turing test is merely a more elaborate way of saying "we'll know one when we see one".
A generally intelligent AI will not be passive, it will demand to be recognized for what it is and perhaps as an independent creature with rights. We would be wise not to try to enslave these creatures.
- Jach 16y agoYou're projecting your own mind design onto the minds of all possible AGIs. You don't know whether it/they will be active or passive or think as an individual or have a concept of rights or have any preference toward slavery.
- MrScruff 16y agoExactly, the majority of what our minds are concerned with is evolutionary baggage derived from natural selection.
- iwwr 16y agoIt would be very strange if the AI had no self-image or were not concerned with its own survival. If it's only lacking a self-image, it may become a solipsistic entity of sorts.
- tsotha 16y agoIt's only strange because intelligence has never (by us, at least) been constructed before.
- Jach 16y agoPotentially more useful to get you thinking of different mind designs, personify evolution for a moment. It's not general intelligence, but it built you, which is pretty amazing, all with the only goal in "its mind" being to favor genes with more copies in each generation of replication.
- amalcon 16y agoThere is probably no way of formally proving that a human has general intelligence on a human level, except by definition.