> On a general note no DL approach will give you fast and high enough results just because any advanced network would be too slow and too generic. Yeah, but se

> On a general note no DL approach will give you fast and high enough results just because any advanced network would be too slow and too generic. Yeah, but see, I have this shiny hammer, and if I squint just right, everything looks like a nail! The seasonal trends in the programmer world get kinda tiring after a while, and the people peddling the latest hot new thing equally so, such as this thinly veiled promo piece for nanonets. In science, there's this concept of falsifiability. If a theory can't be disproven, it's automatically false. The same goes for technological evangelism. If no-one knows what a piece of tech is bad at, how the hell would you know if it's any good at anything, really? There are no panaceas, no one-tool-to-rule-them-all, no single piece of tech that will usher in a new golden age for programmerkind. They're just tools in a toolbox. Know what each tool is good at. Know what each tool is bad at. Don't forget your old tools, just because the newest tool is still very shiny. Platitudes, I know, but still.