3 ms·
Not a bad idea, I have seen some simular but for the love of god why the docker dependancy ? Any stripped down version ? Let me rephrase that, I'd like to tes
by bilekas 7y ago
Not a bad idea, I have seen some simular but for the love of god why the docker dependancy ?
Any stripped down version ?
Let me rephrase that, I'd like to test this out, maybe even use it, but I don't want docker near my machine..
- pizza234 7y agoWhy the hate for Docker? :-) As I wrote in another post, using a Docker in this case is a form of packaging, which is reasonable for a young project. Of course, ideally (and/or in the long-term), one would use something more specific, like distro-based packages or snaps/similar.
- bilekas 7y agoI don't have a hate for Docker, its really useful for certain things, but with a project like this I would preffer to run it myself without th docker scafolding and hand holding, I would like to go straight in here and play around. It's just a preference I guess, but it's time consuming now to go and extract the docker fluff for me. > which is reasonable for a young project I would argue a more mature project would benefit more from stronger versioning management though.
- gustavosbarreto 7y ago> Not a bad idea, I have seen some simular but for the love of god why the docker dependancy ? ShellHub is built using the microservices design pattern, meaning that multiple small, isolated services. Docker is an excellent tool for managing and deploying microservices. I'm open for suggestions and other options.