This is purely personal preference and probably not reflective of the overall market, but to me the big disadvantage of the iPad is that, as long as it's only r

This is purely personal preference and probably not reflective of the overall market, but to me the big disadvantage of the iPad is that, as long as it's only running iOS, I still always feel like I need to own a "real" computer to do "real" work on. The Microsoft offering is inferior as a tablet and inferior as a desktop OS (again subjective opinion), but it lets you have both a tablet and a laptop form factor without needing to own two units of hardware. In a lot of ways it feels kind of like when I first switched from Windows to Mac back in the early 2000s. I knew that for 98% of stuff I do with a computer, OS9 (and then OSX) was perfectly fine. But the hassle of doing any of the other 2% kept me locked in. Making the jump from OSX to iOS feels the same way. The apps all seem to be 90% of what I need without issue, another 8% okay enough for now, and then 2% just unworkable. (And then there is the nightmare of trying to use many regular old websites on mobile these days with all the unresponsive scripts and ad cruft they carry.) I'd love it if Apple could figure out some kind of bridge for iOS workloads to meet this, similar to how Parallels or BootCamp can let you get by with those 1 or 2 Windows things you still needed to do after switching. Maybe just let the iPad remote into my Mac at home if it has internet or have it run some kind of stripped down, emulated version of OSX.