4 ms·
https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html This article, along with some other sites and my own digg
by minewastaken 7y ago
https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html https://digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/mozilla.html
This article, along with some other sites and my own digging made me leave Firefox for good. It's a good read if you value privacy and think Mozilla is the good guy in a field dominated by evil corporations. At first it might seem biased, but the author makes very good points and backs them up with tons of sources that can't be really argued - most of the article is reviewing privacy policies and terms of service agreements that are available publicly to check.
For now I stuck with Pale Moon, but I'm considering some other browsers like Ungoogled Chromium for my daily private and work use. Pale Moon feels kinda janky and old-school in a not good way. But it's fast and (with some minor tweaking: https://spyware.neocities.org/guides/palemoon.html https://spyware.neocities.org/guides/palemoon.html) respects your privacy 100%.
- vkou 7y agoI've read through the first bit of it, and the author comes off as a huge pedant. They spend most of the introduction ranting about browser features being removed in updates - because their expectation seems to be that once Mozilla ships a feature, it must forevermore be a part of the latest version of the browser, from now, until the heat death of the universe... Disclaimer: I don't actually use Firefox, I don't have a hobby horse in this race.
- aasasd 7y agoFunny how the design of that article borders on typical insane unreadable looks of conspiracy theory sites.