3 ms·
For any kind of discussion where there are multiple conflicting ideas, it is likely that an argument based even at least partially on opinion can be disturbing
by diegoperini 7y ago
For any kind of discussion where there are multiple conflicting ideas, it is likely that an argument based even at least partially on opinion can be disturbing to one or some of the parties.
- Udik 7y agoThere is no opinion here. Just someone who advances a pretty harmless proposal.
- diegoperini 7y agoThere are more facts than opinions there and thus, I totally support what the author is proposing! But this doesn't mean the whole piece is written in a neutral tone. Here is the paragraph which includes the author's opinion, initiated with a seemingly rhetorical question: > Is Wirt really fighting anti-semitism, or could the DebConf20 organizers simply be afraid of any discussion that may deter wealthy Israeli sponsors? This doesn't suggest that Israelis have actually sought such influence, it is more of an indication of how easily some volunteers with official roles in Debian are bamboozled when anyone, whether it is an Israeli company or a Silicon Valley company, shows up with a fistful of cash.
- arpa 7y agoInflammatory is the word you're looking for. Or flamebait.