4 ms·
If that were true, the people would have renamed them back 70 years ago when India took back control, just as a symbol of regaining control. They didn't. Faili
by sh87 7y ago
If that were true, the people would have renamed them back 70 years ago when India took back control, just as a symbol of regaining control. They didn't.
Failing that, local culture would refer to those cities by those reticent names somewhere. Local newspapers, pamphlets, propaganda material. No evidence of that.
- save_ferris 7y agoApparently the effort to reestablish native Indian community names began in 1947 and has been going on for several decades[0], you're not correct about this. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaming_of_cities_in_India https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaming_of_cities_in_India