Isn't this a solved issue, dead horse, decided discussion, etc.? This comes up on every paywalled article. These sites sometimes have interesting content so we

Isn't this a solved issue, dead horse, decided discussion, etc.? This comes up on every paywalled article. These sites sometimes have interesting content so we allow them to be posted. Some great pieces are written by very established news papers with skilled career journalists. Many members pay for these sites, others often post workarounds. Why automatically ignore all the paywalled sites that may in fact contain high quality content? If such articles are so truly unpopular then they won't make frontpage, can't that filter be sufficient enough?