3 ms·
I disagree and propose that we are indeed exiting a golden age of objectivity that evolved alongside Western Civilization the past century at the least if not l
by ramraj07 7y ago
I disagree and propose that we are indeed exiting a golden age of objectivity that evolved alongside Western Civilization the past century at the least if not longer.
We developed as a world because the most important nations did not peddle obvious distortions of facts in matters of fundamental importance (that all people are equal, that no one deserves to die, that the world needs preservation, and recently, that man has indeed harmed this planet irreversibly). Of course, every nation in history has been hypocritical and done grave acts that go against these beliefs, but at the least they'll not try to reason it as right, but often just hide them from public.
Now, we have the major leader of most of the important countries misrepresenting fundamental facts for their political gain, and close to a majority of their population is ready to believe them for myriad reasons. Facts have always been misrepresented by politicians but never this brazenly so, and never at this scale.
"Fake news" is not a phrase that involves any technology in and of itself, and if you were right, then this phrase should have been in lexicon for ages. But it hasnt, has it? People a decade or two back would contest facts, but never had I heard anyone say "facts don't matter" till 2015 or so. Things have changed, and not to be iterative, ignorance of this change again shows the inabilities of even the "enlightened" or whatever it is the people around here would like to call themselves to cope with change. Only time will tell where this will lead us.
- keiferski 7y agoThis is a very historically-ignorant view. Every culture and state since the beginning of time has manipulated information to suit its needs. We don’t even need to back that far: the beginning of the Iraq war, not even twenty years ago, was rife with “fake news.” The fact that the buzzword didn’t exist doesn’t mean that the phenomenon didn’t exist.
- Moghammed 7y agoThe modern world with its social networks makes it so much easier to do on a large scale, though. https://medium.com/@francois.chollet/what-worries-me-about-ai-ed9df072b704 https://medium.com/@francois.chollet/what-worries-me-about-a...
- everdrive 7y agoCertainly the sheer volume of fake information available today is orders of magnitude different.
- honestoHeminway 7y agoEven back then, pseudo-science that seemed to fit to humans feelings was pretty rampant. The Physiognomy was a accepted science http://www.theijes.com/papers/v3-i12/Version-3/G031203039047.pdf http://www.theijes.com/papers/v3-i12/Version-3/G031203039047... , racial quak-science and pseudo-physics where rampant. The truth is, we where always prone to believe in non-sense that felt good or was close to our preception. We just had a large surplus to bribe everyone into shutting the hell up and let the pros run the show. Now it has run out, and the whole ilusion of a nicer, better world with nicer, newer, better humans - goes into the bin.