> didn't use fingerprints It might still be a bad idea. I don't know what has changed since, but this source (0) says fingerprinting hasn't been subjected to s

> didn't use fingerprints It might still be a bad idea. I don't know what has changed since, but this source (0) says fingerprinting hasn't been subjected to scientific review. [0] : https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171005111100.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171005111100.h...