3 ms·
with "performance" i meant the error rate, not the speed. speed was not a criteria for us, so we didnt evaluate it. i read that deepspeech is way quicker in tr
by ftreml 7y ago
with "performance" i meant the error rate, not the speed. speed was not a criteria for us, so we didnt evaluate it.
i read that deepspeech is way quicker in training phase as it is smarter in using gpu computing power.
- magicalhippo 7y agoAhh gotcha. Yes I got rather poor "hit rate" until I made my own language model. Fortunately for me I only needed it for command recognition, so the process was quite quick, and results were very good. No need to retrain the net.
- ftreml 7y agowe used a context-free data set, augmented with additional domain-specific sound samples and it worked out fine, although the additiinal samples made nearly no difference