3 ms·
That statement is false. Take Factor for example. It has been hosted at several conferences, has an active community of users, and has an academic paper publis
by oconnore 16y ago
That statement is false.
Take Factor for example. It has been hosted at several conferences, has an active community of users, and has an academic paper published in ACM.
http://factorcode.org/littledan/dls.pdf http://factorcode.org/littledan/dls.pdf
Perhaps what you meant to say is that no citations exist that meet your own apparently arbitrary standards of approval?
Edit:
It appears that it was another individual who recommended wiki/Factor for deletion. I apologize for my inaccurate accusation, but in my opinion that still does not excuse recommending the removal of Nemerle.
- jedsmith 16y agoOr that he didn't spend enough time looking: > It takes me but a few minutes to figure out whether I am going to nominate an article for deletion. A single hit that looks like it might possibly be a reliable source and I'm outta there. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2215437 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2215437 Reassuring description of the process, there...
- chrismonsanto 16y agoBut I didn't nominate Factor for deletion...
- oconnore 16y agoI apologize for the confusion, but that still doesn't change much. See these papers on Nemerle: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/events/sscli2005/pacholski-moskal.pdf http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/events/sscli2005/pachols... http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/moskal/pdf/msc.pdf http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/moskal/pdf/msc...