4 ms·
This report is a pure, unadulterated, dumpster fire. No one is explaining how a video file is a trojan vector. Also this report has way too much background of t
by an-allen 7y ago
This report is a pure, unadulterated, dumpster fire. No one is explaining how a video file is a trojan vector. Also this report has way too much background of the “Hacking Team” that really sounds suspect from me. I just feel if you are trying to establish that this vector was the source of a trojan - youd actually prove that instead of giving a page or two of conjecture on where this code that you haven’t shown is malware - came from.
Also, obligatory, correlation does not imply causation. This report hinges on the argument that “video received from MBS and shortly thereafter the total data egress increased”. Okay what data was egressed? Where was it egressed to? Just basic things are missing from this report that are relevant.
Absolute garbage.
- mrobins 7y ago> Also this report has way too much background of the “Hacking Team” that really sounds suspect from me. Consultants write like high school students with a ten page research paper requirement. If you don’t have real content pad it with extra background, bulleted lists and superfluous tables. The final product needs to be long enough so people think real work was done but boring enough that they don’t actually read it.