4 ms·
As far as I know, the studio is happy to let her perform the work non-commercially, but that’s not what she wants. She wants to be able to be paid for a perform
by true_religion 7y ago
As far as I know, the studio is happy to let her perform the work non-commercially, but that’s not what she wants. She wants to be able to be paid for a performance.
- thaumasiotes 7y agoAgain, why does the compulsory cover license not satisfy this?
- true_religion 7y agoBecause she sold the right to commercialize her work. It's part of the comment I'm responding to. Adding a compulsory non-commercial license won't help an artist who wants sell commercial licences when they are getting started, then unilaterally renege because they are popular enough to do it all themselves.