4 ms·
>Like the article said, people are much more cost averse. People includes leadership and product. Both of which will almost always decline this strategy. If yo
by medlyyy 7y ago
>Like the article said, people are much more cost averse. People includes leadership and product. Both of which will almost always decline this strategy.
If you're saying this, then call it like it is: you're calling leadership and product stupid. Because unless you substantively disagree with the logic in the article, you're agreeing that the parallel experimentation strategy does all of:
reach a solution faster,
cost substantially less,
and result in greater wealth generation later.
Later here meaning only "within 5 years," so not even that much later. If you're a business, what else do you care about than wealth generation?
I thought the article was very, very good.
- haggy 7y agoThe logic in this article is way too cut and dry in almost every way. For example the article exclaims that "parallel is always faster than serial". That assertion does not hold up in software engineering and it doesn't hold up with teams either.