3 ms·
Yes, in "you can't play 20 questions with nature", Alan newell advocated for computational "unified models" of cognition. But they were heavily symbolic. While
by dr_dshiv 7y ago
Yes, in "you can't play 20 questions with nature", Alan newell advocated for computational "unified models" of cognition. But they were heavily symbolic. While useful, they don't really make it more understandable. (That's my experience with act-r, anyway! It's useful, but doesn't give big picture synthesis, like a Newtonian model might. It's a lot of little models.)
- asdfgftheaef 7y agoHere's a different perspective: https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744 https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2744 "A Standard Model of the Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework across Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Robotics"