3 ms·
Sure but that’s like saying anyone that’s worked for 40 years and saved up a nest egg is wealthy without income, or a CEO between jobs is wealthy without income
by yibg 7y ago
Sure but that’s like saying anyone that’s worked for 40 years and saved up a nest egg is wealthy without income, or a CEO between jobs is wealthy without income. There most certainly was income at some point.
- WalterBright 7y agoMy phrase was "have income" in present tense, not "had income" in the past.
- yibg 7y agoYou wrote “Having wealth does indeed require having income in the past.”