4 ms·
We built everything ourselves. The parser in particular was written in-house by a Person Who No Longer Works Here who was a parser enthusiast (Conway’s law). If
by aednichols 7y ago
We built everything ourselves. The parser in particular was written in-house by a Person Who No Longer Works Here who was a parser enthusiast (Conway’s law). If we were starting from scratch today I would think we would use an off the shelf package. One excellent choice was to make the language [0] an open standard and now there is at least one totally novel implementation [1] in addition to ours [2].
0. https://github.com/openwdl/wdl https://github.com/openwdl/wdl
1. https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/miniwdl https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/miniwdl
2. https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell
- ablekh 7y agoI appreciate your clarifications. Until now, I was aware of [0], but not [1] and [2]. Your implementation seems be much more popular than both the new alternative and a reference implementation. The (general and scientific) workflow engines universe is very large - it likely contains, at least, dozens of production-level implementations. Such diversity is both a blessing and a curse, though ...