I concur. I only occasionally use !g w/ DDG now, whereas two years ago it was more frequent (although I can't quantify). I stuck w/ it as I wanted some distan

I concur. I only occasionally use !g w/ DDG now, whereas two years ago it was more frequent (although I can't quantify). I stuck w/ it as I wanted some distance between myself and Google. Whether I've achieved any distance is an open question and I suspect that it is less than it feels like when I use DDG. The results are comparable in my current experience. Compage searches for 'bluetooth speakers' on Google [0] and DDG [1]. In my location (Canada) DDG returns national results which are preferred and relevant. I like that on the DDG results page the ad is clearly separated from organic results and I get the results w/out a mapping insert. That's just my preference, though. Even the results URLs speak volumes. I have no idea what data - if any - I'm exposing about myself w/ the Google result. [0] https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=KyUsXtPGIIGL5wKRx7OYDg&q=bluetooth+speakers&oq=bluetooth+speakers&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.1203.5693..6226...0.0..0.113.1277.17j1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131.6l0tVnNAqTY&ved=0ahUKEwiTiK7R0Z7nAhWBxVkKHZHjDOMQ4dUDCAg&uact=5 https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=KyUsXtPGIIGL5wKRx7... [1] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=bluetooth+speakers&ia=shopping https://duckduckgo.com/?q=bluetooth+speakers&ia=shopping