4 ms·

I don't think it's a conspiracy -- If you can't go to expedia.com as easily as you can Google search Expedia, you'll probably do the later. And if you Google s

I don't think it's a conspiracy -- If you can't go to expedia.com as easily as you can Google search Expedia, you'll probably do the later. And if you Google search Expedia, the first result is usually an ad for Expedia. Now Google makes money on you in a way they hadn't before. The more people expect Google to deal with all of the silly "web domain stuff" for them, the more money Google makes. It's all about the incentives, and in the end there's only one incentive -- money. I don't think anyone working at Google is being intentionally bad at all, but I do think their incentive structure ultimately results in prioritizing feeding people ads as much a possible. The A/B tests show that doing things a certain way results in more revenue, and that's what drives the decisions. There are likely no ethics meetings on the implications on society for each small change, but the collective result of many small harmless changes (aimed at increasing profit) is bad for society in the end. Not due to any conspiracy or "evil".

gundmc 7y ago
The change was a welcome QoL improvement in my opinion. Typing a new address or copying the URL of the page I'm on covers ~95% of the use cases where I'm accessing the address bar on mobile and the change significantly reduces friction for both. It's exhausting to see every minute move Google/Amazon makes filtered through the HN cynicism lens. Edit: Talking specifically about the chrome on Android omnibar change. The favicon desktop search change from TFA was awful.
- AJ007 7y ago
  Google has explicitly said they want to get rid of URLs. Here is a story from April 2019: https://www.wired.com/story/google-wants-to-kill-the-url/ https://www.wired.com/story/google-wants-to-kill-the-url/
throwaway3699 7y ago
Google encourages all engineers to write an ethics section in their design docs, but like all design docs things tend to be optional. Source: Google employee.
shadowgovt 7y ago
At least an Android, any URL you can navigate to you can pin to the home screen. This seems a week way to force behavior people go to the same place commonly.
shadowgovt 7y ago
> There are likely no ethics meetings on the implications on society with respect, I don't think there would be an ethics meeting scenario about whether the default interaction for tapping the URL bar is copy or edit that would find any ethical concerns, besides "nerds will be annoyed we moved their cheese."

gundmc 7y ago

The change was a welcome QoL improvement in my opinion. Typing a new address or copying the URL of the page I'm on covers ~95% of the use cases where I'm accessing the address bar on mobile and the change significantly reduces friction for both. It's exhausting to see every minute move Google/Amazon makes filtered through the HN cynicism lens. Edit: Talking specifically about the chrome on Android omnibar change. The favicon desktop search change from TFA was awful.

AJ007 7y ago
Google has explicitly said they want to get rid of URLs. Here is a story from April 2019: https://www.wired.com/story/google-wants-to-kill-the-url/ https://www.wired.com/story/google-wants-to-kill-the-url/

throwaway3699 7y ago

Google encourages all engineers to write an ethics section in their design docs, but like all design docs things tend to be optional. Source: Google employee.

shadowgovt 7y ago

At least an Android, any URL you can navigate to you can pin to the home screen. This seems a week way to force behavior people go to the same place commonly.

shadowgovt 7y ago

> There are likely no ethics meetings on the implications on society with respect, I don't think there would be an ethics meeting scenario about whether the default interaction for tapping the URL bar is copy or edit that would find any ethical concerns, besides "nerds will be annoyed we moved their cheese."