5 ms·
Ask HN: Idea feedback – Service where people pay to reach your inbox
Problem - The bar to sending an email is too low resulting in casual low-effort messages. These messages take up time and attention and are difficult to filter. For instance, recruiter spam.
Solution - A service where a person pays a nominal amount, say $2, to land in your inbox. These messages will have 'PRIORITY INBOX' in their subject. This lets you filter the high-effort messages at a glance.
Possible use cases
1. Recruiter spam - This will let you filter the serious from the casual requests at a glance. Messages with 'PRIORITY INBOX' in the subject tell you the recruiter paid to get your attention and likely worth your time.
2. For an influencer - Say you run a blog and review developer tools every week. If you get tons of requests to cover different tools, you could use this service to filter out low-effort requests
3. Mentor-mentee - As mentor you can filter high-effort queries via this service. As the sender pays to reach your inbox, the messages are likely to be more focused so that you respond
This model can apply to other types of unsolicited messages where
a) Sender wants to stand-out from the generic low effort messages
b) Receiver wants to quickly filter high-effort and casual messages
I'd like to get HN's thoughts on
1. If you see value in such a service
2. For what type of messages, filtering quality and low-effort messages is of most value to you? (like developer-recruiter, mentor-mentee)
3. What concerns about this service would keep you from using it? (Assuming privacy and mail deliverability are handled to your satisfaction)
I've started work on this product. If you want to join private beta, signup here - https://airtable.com/shr6ifqw3468JFT0H
- Alex3917 7y agoLots of startups have already done this.
- dsinecos 7y agoI did a quick search but couldn't find any. Can you share a few names of those startups?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- erikbrodch 7y agoEarn.com did that, but since acquired by coinbase
- verdverm 7y agoSame post from yesterday https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22137578 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22137578
- psv1 7y agoSo the receiver pays you for access to the service and the sender also pays you for access to the receiver? I hate everything about this double-dipping-middle-man-in-an-otherwise-free-interaction business model.
- quickthrower2 7y agoThe problem is if it’s worth $2 to send me an email then I’m worth a lot, so I don’t care about receiving $2, is rather just not receive those emails at all. I can just subscribe to the emails I do want, and would be happy to do that for no payment.